misconception about other country – story continue from The Image Hollywood Created of Africa

article from The Image Hollywood Created of Africa | Films For Action

 

Part of reason is this: Majority people never even been to other country or they never meet people from other country. So they have no idea what it’s like living in another world–another country. But media and some stupid propaganda making this huge misconception–that some country’s people are inhuman or even call them as ‘evil’.

Cultural differences became some kind of demonized act. These things, some political leader and media take advantage of it–no, unfortunately these people also brainwashed by media. So they think other country or other culture are evil so they have to destroy–correct them.

Don’t complain they are in dictatorship or inequality issue. You have your own inequality issue and dictatorship–through media brainwashed people and control them. You can’t solve your country’s problem but you can solve other country’s problem???
That’s why you are brainwashed by media.

So ‘invasion’, we called ‘war’.

 

 

P.S. A few other factors:
– Travelling to other country doesn’t mean understand other country’s culture–some people know very little about other culture but they said they knew everything.
– Simple fact, media (and government agency) keep reporting that it’s dangerous to travel some country. Think about the other side, if that country is so dangerous, how people live there? Have you ever even thought about this? We are all human being, after all. They are not evil, you know.
– Think about this. Do you think people will even read this? Just unknown guy’s talk, why do people even bother, right?
And do you think people believe what I said? Or people will believe what newspaper, TV and magazine said.
Whatever it is, in the end, people will listen and believe (even follow them) what famous newspaper, magazine, TV said.
Unfortunately, that is the fact.

And this misunderstanding, misconception will continue.

 

One of truth about the feminism issue.

#needmentalitychange #verysecret
#fundamentalunderstanding #feminism
If guy sleep with lots of girls, we call it very enviously ‘playboy’.
If girl sleep with lots of boys, we call it very sluttishly ‘slut’.
What’s wrong with this world? Nobody understand this. But everyone saying they understand well about the feminism issue.
It became just hot-hot-hot-topic. Not really to understand the issue.

Of course, many people just fell for rubbish news or they just listen and believe them if that is famous.

#enlightenment

p.s. If you really understand this well, you can extend this logic(??) to find out thousands and thousands of fundamental problem.

misconception about the language

Before go on, you should better read earlier article ‘One year old or two years old baby can talk??‘ @ July 14, 2014

 

Koreans poor skills of English (because they spent so much time-something like ten to twenty years or even forty years-for learn English language and they can’t communicate with English at all) came from misconception about the language.

Of course, there have so many other factors which I am not reveal here–but if you understand Korean, you can read it from my Korean blogs like this one.

 

Some people (probably mother who has a child.. Actually almost all the Koreans) believe that one year old baby can talk so they think they can communicate through talk.

So if they can memorized the word(vocabulary) as many as possible, and then they think they can speak like English native.

 
I wrote so many things about how to learn English properly. But I can’t help them. Because I can’t change other people’s mind.

 

One year old or two years old baby can talk??

Someone was asked about “How many words can your 1 year old say?” at Circle of Moms website.

And Circle of Moms website user ‘Mariane’ answered:

In general, increase in expressive vocabulary usually occur between 15 to 20 months.

source: http://www.circleofmoms.com/welcome-to-circle-of-moms/how-many-words-can-your-12-month-old-say-520583

 

By 18 months, you can expect him to be able to say up to 20 words. Not all babies, however, …

Quote from JustMommies.com’s article ‘When Should My Baby Start Talking?‘

 

 

Below’s quote from article ‘Delayed Speech or Language Development’ at KidsHealth from Nemours website

Your son is 2 years old and still isn’t talking. He says a few words, but compared with his peers you think he’s way behind.

It’s too long so I will skip the part. If you are interested, you can read whole article from below the link.

The Difference Between Speech and Language

Speech and language are often confused, but there is a distinction between the two: ….

source: http://kidshealth.org/parent/growth/communication/not_talk.html

 

 

So one or two years old baby really can talk or actually he or she is babbling about something?

 

if your society isn’t so barbaric, how come your country always attacking other country?

Don’t get me wrong. I am not big fan of some of Muslim’s practice like women must wear hijab and other dress code and etc. (I actually don’t like it but at least I am respecting their choices.)
And you can argue or discuss about it also fine. But if you talking like that kind of practice is pure barbaric thing to do, that’s seriously wrong with your society. (Should I talk about how barbaric western’s Catholic is? Try to research what Pope or priest done things. You can’t solve the your problem but you are so right to attacking other religion?)

(Of course, that’s how media brainwashed to the people with tagline ‘Muslim is Evil’. And start invasion.)

So if your society isn’t so barbaric, how come your country always attacking other country?
This world became more more pathetic.

I wrote this because I heard when someone describe about the practice with so much hatred in it and surprisingly talk show’s host completely agree on that–It means their producer and people and their channel agree that it is right to hate the Muslim, isn’t it?

 

I wrote this at 8:42pm 12 December 2013 in my facebook account here.

 

P.S. Many of western media attacking Muslim. And then so deceivingly put slogan like ‘world peace’. Are you kidding me?

Of course, most problem is people fell for it.

 

 

They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life. -unknown

When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.” – unknown

via fb@ Cliff Hansen

It’s an interesting thought. But it looks like John Lennon didn’t say about this.
You can read discussion about the source in Wikipedia: Is this a real quote from John Lennon? – Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2011 October 30 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Whoever said about it isn’t important, is it?

It’s interesting to see why people put anonymous quote in some famous person. So it feels like a bit deceiving. So I can understand people can feel uncomfortable with this quote.
But if I pursuit of my happiness, it means I’m being selfish?! You can see from people’s talk here: Did John Lennon really say this? It sounds so stupid. | IGN Boards

I told you in the previous article: “Maybe your country’s situation is better. But how much better, do you think?” –We never ask ‘why’. That’s why our(and your) education system failed. @ December 22, 2013

 

Whom am I talking to? If you ask me. To the Europeans.

Rather than Americans.

 

I believe this super power came from not just army–How do you think they can support(keep that huge) army? From people, isn’t it? It was sponsored by people. So why do they support them? Who gave that idea, do you think?

It’s the media. People were infected by what media was saying.

 

What you have to know is that I talk lots about American thing but my tweets aren’t for American. I am trying to talk to #European

6:33 PM – 1 Oct 13

 

Because whether we like it or not. American media dominated whole world nowadays because of internet which about 55% websites are English.

6:40 PM – 1 Oct 13

 

Many articles here and my twitter account and google+ account’s talks were intended to the Europeans.

It’s not for Koreans. And Americans.

 

There has a technical term call the ‘laugh track’.

When I was searching something in imdb.com, I found this American TV show call the ‘Dads (2013)’.

And I thought it could be quite funny idea because someone might have two dads. So I became quite curious about the show and found this tagline “Two best friends. One dad situation.” in imdb.com’s Dads (2013) page. This could be funny show, I thought.

But not for long.

I’ve found this review from imdb.com user Narce.

In the first few seconds of this show, I noticed that the “audience” laughed at every line and gesture as if it was the funniest thing they had ever heard.

quote from No, no, no! Not another laugh track! @ 20 September 2013 by Narce

Laugh track. What an amazing term!

So I googled it. And I found out that ‘even in wikipedia has it’.

In some productions the laughter is a live audience response; in the U.S., the term usually implies artificial laughter (canned laughter or fake laughter) made to be inserted into the show.

quote from Laugh track – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

behind story
–but I don’t go more deep down.

I think this laugh track idea is understandable because some people are shy to laugh-Oh, how unhappy life we are having, don’t you think?- and it is easy to make them laugh through other people’s laughing.

But problem is now this money chaser come in to play for make easy money and make easy show. So they try to force you to laugh
or
they think that people are so stupid that people can’t understand difficult jokes so they try to teach people to when to laugh.

Do you think I am too sarcastic?

Believe it or not. It’s your choice. But you must think about why they were keep doing that rubbish thing?

Do you think they were so stupid that they don’t know that’s rubbish thing?

Your (and my) life wasn’t important than some famous TV shows or stars?!

Someone tweeted this:

RT @MelissaStetten: You know what would suck? Dying yesterday before seeing the Breaking Bad finale.

* She deleted this tweet so you can’t see this tweet any more.

So I retweeted them and write these in twitter and facebook.

 

This is exactly what I’ve been told everyone. Your(and my) life wasn’t important than some famous TV show or star.
12:03 PM – 1 Oct 13

People are totally wrong way to prioritise the things. This is exactly why book The Tipping Point ruined so many people in United States.
12:04 PM – 1 Oct 13

Because last time not many people are chasing the trend but nowadays everyone chasing the trend. “Trend is everything.” #ftw <– see?!
12:08 PM – 1 Oct 13

 

If you closely look at the people in twitter or facebook, you can see what people are talking about. I’m sure 90 out of 100 things(Maybe I’m over emphasizing it but…) are all related to the TV, news and famous stars.

 

That’s why I wrote We are Zombies. Time magazine says so. @ May 21, 2013 before.

 

When I am writing this post in wordpress.com, I can see the full of blog articles in the Related Articles section about TV shows and ‘Breaking Bad’. It proves that I was totally right–“Nowadays everyone chasing the trend.” is almost ‘fact’.

 

Conspiracy is just conspiracy. Are you sure?

Microsoft bought Nokia with €5.44 billion which some people-who like Symbian and some of Finnish people-already guessed this will happen when the formal Microsoft CEO, Stephen Elop joined company.

 

This is the what I wrote about it.

Suspicion on American investor take over Finnish company. @ February 12, 2011
I will quote interesting part:

So people commented on Nokia Conversations blog. And one of story you will see is that “Microsoft bought Nokia for a penny.”

And one of good example comment is this: Lucian Armasu’s reply on article What the Web Is Saying: Nokia Partners With Microsoft @ February 11, 2011 by Ryan Kim

What better way to take over a company as big as Nokia than to replace its top leadership with “former” Microsoft employees. I’m not just talking about Elop here. They are already hiring other former MS employees in top Nokia positions.

And Shaun replied that

Yep. New boss of Nokia USA is an ex-Microsoftie, Chris Webber.

 

All the Nokians were fooled by …. @ February 12, 2011

Here is the news from Guardian.

Nokia’s handset business bought by Microsoft for €5.44bn @ September 3, 2013 by Charles Arthur
Move by Steve Ballmer moves Microsoft closer to ‘devices and services’ aim and brings Stephen Elop back to Redmond
This is interesting part:

Rumours that Microsoft intended to buy Nokia had been floated since Elop joined the company. When he chose to dump its home-grown Symbian and Meego smartphone software in favour of Microsoft’s newer Windows Phone software in February 2011, a number of Finnish observers accused him of being a “Trojan horse” for Microsoft.

 

It said “rumours” but if you read my article, I am sure you will agree that it can’t be rumours.

 

And here is another article.

With $7.17 Billion Nokia Buy, Microsoft Brings Its Trojan Horse Home @ September 3, 2013 by CADE METZ
This article may not interest you but you can read lots of inside story from people’s comments.

I will quote some interesting comments:

user Grayden said:

Anyone paying attention who didn’t see this coming is a moron. People a few years back wondered why Elop was making such stupid decisions at Nokia that kept their business stagnant; they had only to look at where he came from: Microsoft. Said it then, he was a corporate mole intent on deflating Nokia to the point where Microsoft would either exceed them in the smartphone realm, or purchase them.

 

user APai said:

actually, plenty of analysts did forecast the exact sequence of events, while he was busy carving out divisions of nokia that MICROSOFT DID NOT NEED. people questioned why every move was to microsoft’s advantage.

 

If there has so many fact, it can’t be a conspiracy but people don’t really try to find the truth.

So I will prove just one thing: “Microsoft bought Nokia for a penny.” is a true statement.

I don’t know much about financial or stock market but I found this:

Nokia is engaged in the manufacturing of mobile devices and in converging Internet and communications industries, with over 132,000 employees in 120 countries, sales in more than 150 countries and global annual revenue of over €42 billion and operating profit of €2 billion as of 2010.

quote from NOK – Stock Quote and Charts for Nokia

Annual revenue is €44 billion company. And Microsoft bought Nokia for €5.44 billion.

 

Here is another truth:

user watcher278 said:

Lol your not stating anything new, anyone who could see, saw this. Nokia valued at 7.17 billion while Skype is valued at 8 billion?! Lol.. Mission Accomplished..

 

user Diego Muñoz said:

This is a fact: MS pay more for a soft-phone Company (Skype) than for a real-hard-phone company (Nokia)

 

user SixSixSix said:

They paid way to much for Skype. Seems to me they got Nokia’s phone operations for steal. Compare that to $130 billion for Verizon to buy its freedom or Google paying $12 billion for Motorola (which was also highly maybe even over priced).

 

If you can really understand, you can see the world more different way.

 

 

You can also read this article:  The Grand Elop Conspiracy is suddenly looking less crazy @ September 3, 2013 by Brad Reed